Developing Tourism Service Customization Indicators: Establishing the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Satisfaction Levels: A case study of Sanandaj

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

10.22059/jut.2026.394374.1292

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
The tourism industry is increasingly oriented toward service customization as a key strategy for enhancing tourist satisfaction. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) plays an important role by enabling data analysis, predicting tourist needs, and supporting the delivery of personalized services. Sanandaj, with its distinctive cultural and historical attractions, has considerable potential for the development of customized tourism services. However, the capabilities of artificial intelligence have not yet been fully utilized to attract tourists and enhance their retention in this city. This study aims to develop indicators for service customization in tourism and to provide a practical framework for the application of artificial intelligence in this field, using the city of Sanandaj as a case study. The research adopts a mixed-methods approach integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques. In the quantitative phase, a questionnaire comprising 24 items measured on a Likert scale was administered to tourists during the Nowruz holiday in 2025. A total of 325 valid questionnaires were collected through convenience sampling and analyzed using SPSS software and Pearson correlation analysis. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts in the fields of information technology and artificial intelligence to identify key challenges and opportunities related to the use of AI in tourism services. The findings indicate that the quality of online information and the accessibility of digital services have a significant and positive influence on tourist satisfaction. Furthermore, the absence of effective systems for service customization and inadequate information infrastructure were identified as the main challenges. Accordingly, the study recommends that urban managers and tourism industry stakeholders improve digital infrastructure and implement AI-based customized services to enhance tourist experience and satisfaction.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The tourism industry, as one of the largest and most influential sectors of the global economy, is currently undergoing a fundamental transition toward digitalization. This transformation has been driven by the rapid advancement of digital technologies, with artificial intelligence and information and communication systems playing a central role in reshaping tourism service delivery and tourist–destination interactions. In the contemporary digital environment, tourists are no longer passive recipients of standardized services; instead, they actively seek accurate, up-to-date, and personalized information that enables them to plan their trips independently and efficiently. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a core enabling technology in this transformation. By analyzing large volumes of data and identifying behavioral patterns, AI allows tourism businesses and destination managers to automatically tailor their services at scale. This process, commonly referred to as service customization, aims to enhance tourist satisfaction by offering experiences that correspond closely to individual preferences, needs, and expectations. A growing body of empirical research confirms that customized services significantly increase customer satisfaction, strengthen destination loyalty, and improve the overall perceived value of the travel experience.
At the center of this digital evolution are intelligent recommender systems, which play a critical role in reducing the complexity of choice for tourists. These systems assist users in navigating a vast array of destinations, attractions, accommodations, and services by providing targeted and personalized recommendations. Through the integration of AI and machine learning techniques, recommender systems can analyze user behavior, preferences, and feedback, thereby generating more relevant and accurate suggestions. As a result, tourists are better equipped to make informed and optimal decisions, while destinations benefit from improved visitor engagement and satisfaction. Despite the recognized importance of service customization in tourism, objectively measuring the degree of customization and accurately assessing its impact on tourist satisfaction remain challenging. These challenges highlight the need for the development and application of specific quantitative and qualitative indicators capable of capturing both the technical and experiential dimensions of customized online tourism services. This need is particularly evident in destinations with high tourism potential that have not yet fully capitalized on digital opportunities.
The city of Sanandaj, the capital of Kurdistan Province in Iran, represents a clear example of such a destination. Sanandaj possesses rich cultural, historical, and natural attractions; however, despite these advantages, it has struggled to effectively attract and retain tourists. Limited utilization of digital technologies and insufficient development of online tourism services have constrained the city’s competitiveness in an increasingly digital tourism market. Given the central role of digital technologies and the proven impact of service customization on tourist satisfaction and loyalty, the present study investigates opportunities for customizing tourism services through online information platforms in Sanandaj. The research focuses on the Kurdistan Provincial Tourism Website (KurdTourism.com), specifically its sections related to Sanandaj. The main research question guiding this study is: How can the development of indicators for measuring the level of tourism service customization help evaluate its impact on tourist satisfaction in the city of Sanandaj? The ultimate objectives of this research are to analyze existing challenges and opportunities, propose strategies for optimizing online tourism services, and contribute to improving tourist experiences and increasing visitor retention in Sanandaj. By addressing these issues, the study seeks to provide a foundation for evidence-based digital transformation in emerging tourism destinations.
 
Methodology
This study examines the impact of digital technologies on tourism service customization and tourist satisfaction in Sanandaj, with the aim of proposing practical solutions for enhancing online services and improving visitor satisfaction. A mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, was adopted to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. The study population consisted of tourists who visited Sanandaj during the period from March 2025 to mid-April 2025. A total of 325 questionnaires were distributed among visitors, of which 300 were completed fully and deemed suitable for analysis. The quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire containing 24 items designed to measure various dimensions of online tourism services, service customization, and tourist satisfaction. These data were analyzed using SPSS software, and Pearson correlation analysis was employed to examine the relationships between service-related variables and tourist satisfaction. This statistical approach allowed for the identification of significant associations and the relative strength of different service dimensions. In addition to the quantitative component, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts in information technology, artificial intelligence, and tourism development. These interviews aimed to capture in-depth insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the tourism website, the current state of digital infrastructure, and the feasibility of implementing intelligent and customized tourism services. By integrating quantitative findings with qualitative expert perspectives, the study identifies key factors influencing tourism service customization and tourist satisfaction, and formulates practical recommendations for improving online tourism services in Sanandaj.
 
Results and discussion
Tourist satisfaction was evaluated through the integration of quantitative analysis (Pearson correlation test) and qualitative analysis (semi-structured expert interviews), focusing on five key dimensions of online tourism services provided by the Sanandaj tourism website. The first dimension, access to online information, revealed clear priorities among tourists. Quantitative results showed that the quality and quantity of information resources had the strongest positive correlation with tourist satisfaction (r = 0.468). Other critical components, such as information diversity (r = 0.389) and information clarity (r = 0.375), also demonstrated significant positive relationships with satisfaction. These findings underscore the importance of rich, multidimensional, and well-presented content from the users’ perspective. However, qualitative insights obtained from expert interviews revealed a substantial practical gap. Experts emphasized that much of the website’s information is outdated and lacks regular updates. They also noted that the content focuses primarily on well-known attractions while neglecting lesser-known sites with significant tourism potential. Additionally, experts highlighted the presence of vague and insufficient information in several sections. These qualitative findings explain why, despite high statistical significance, considerable room for improvement remains in this dimension.
The second dimension, service customization, yielded particularly revealing results. Quantitative analysis indicated that none of the measured components, such as user data analysis, personalized recommendations, feedback mechanisms, responsiveness to specific needs, or awareness of changing user preferences, showed a statistically significant relationship with tourist satisfaction. These results clearly indicate that service customization does not currently play a meaningful role in the user experience. The qualitative findings provide essential context for interpreting these results. Experts unanimously agreed that the website lacks any active intelligent mechanisms or personalized interaction features. The absence of data analytics systems, feedback sections, and personalized response capabilities confirms that service customization components are not merely ineffective but largely nonexistent in practice.
The third dimension, user experience, demonstrated relative success in the quantitative analysis. Support for multiple devices exhibited the strongest positive correlation with tourist satisfaction across the entire study (r = 0.528). Website design, user interface, and the influence of content on tourists’ perceptions also showed strong and positive correlations. These results highlight the importance of accessibility, visual appeal, and impactful content. Nevertheless, expert assessments painted a more critical picture. The website’s design was described as outdated and visually unengaging, and the mobile version was identified as poorly optimized. Technical issues, such as slow loading speeds, and service shortcomings, including the absence of online support, user guides, and instructional videos, were also noted. Thus, while multi-platform accessibility is highly valued by users, the quality of its implementation remains suboptimal.
The fourth dimension, social and cultural impacts, revealed that tourists value cultural awareness and the preservation of local values, both of which showed significant positive correlations with satisfaction. In contrast, experts argued that the website’s influence in this area is superficial and limited. They emphasized the lack of features facilitating social interaction between tourists and the host community, as well as the complete absence of content related to sustainable tourism. This discrepancy suggests that the website has not fully realized its potential as a cultural bridge or a promoter of social responsibility.
Finally, the fifth dimension, trust in technology, showed that only trust in the website itself had a significant relationship with tourist satisfaction, while more structural components, such as privacy transparency, brand credibility, and perceptions of security risks, had no significant effect. This may indicate that users primarily rely on visible content and surface-level impressions. However, experts issued serious warnings regarding the fragility of this trust. They pointed to the lack of credible information sources, the absence of an SSL security certificate, and unclear privacy policies. These qualitative findings suggest that the foundation of trust is weak and that user satisfaction could quickly deteriorate as awareness of these infrastructural deficiencies increases.
 
Conclusion
The findings of this study clearly demonstrate that the quality of online tourism services plays a decisive role in shaping service customization and tourist satisfaction in the city of Sanandaj. Multi-platform support and the quality of information resources emerged as the most influential factors, exhibiting the strongest positive correlations with tourist satisfaction. These results align with previous research emphasizing the critical importance of reliable and accessible online content in contemporary tourism. However, qualitative evidence from expert interviews reveals two major structural challenges: the absence of intelligent and effective systems for delivering customized services, and the lack of accurate, up-to-date, and comprehensive information about tourist attractions. These shortcomings not only diminish the quality of the tourist experience but also reflect broader weaknesses in the city’s information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure.
Comparative insights suggest that Sanandaj has underperformed in adopting digital technologies and developing related infrastructure compared to similar destinations. Insufficient investment in digital tourism has contributed to feelings of insecurity, dissatisfaction, and uncertainty among visitors regarding the destination’s efficiency and attractiveness. Consequently, transforming digital infrastructure and enhancing online service quality should be considered a prerequisite for increasing tourist retention. Moving toward sustainable tourism development in Sanandaj requires immediate focus on the implementation of intelligent service customization systems based on artificial intelligence, substantial improvement in the quality, quantity, and interactivity of tourism information, and the facilitation of inclusive access to services and attractions through digital channels. Future research may further advance this agenda by conducting comparative studies with successful destinations, analyzing the economic impacts of intelligent tourism services, and exploring the role of social media in destination marketing.
From a broader perspective, the implications of this study extend beyond Sanandaj and contribute directly to tourism development strategies. By demonstrating the critical role of service customization in enhancing tourist satisfaction, this research provides a practical framework for emerging destinations seeking to improve competitiveness in the digital tourism market. Moreover, the findings highlight how investment in intelligent online services can support sustainable tourism growth, strengthen destination branding, and increase visitor loyalty. Ultimately, the adoption of data-driven and customized tourism services can foster more inclusive, resilient, and experience-oriented tourism development.
Funding
In this research, there is no funding support.
 
Funding
In this research, there is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The authors were equally involved in the conception and writing of the work. The authors confirmed the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest in this study.
 
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to those who have contributed to the improvement of this article through their scientific recommendations.

Keywords


  1. Afzal, I., Majid, M. B., Tariq, M. I., & Nasir, A. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Smart Tourism Technologies on Tourist Satisfaction, Engagement & Image and with the Mediation of Memorable Tourist Experience. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 164–177-164–177.
  2. Ahsan, N. T., Soltanifar, M., Jaghargh, S. A. A., Abbaspour, A., & Farhani, A. (2023). Presenting a Smart Tourism Model Considering the Social Media Factor (Case Study: Hamedan). Journal of tourism and leisure, 8(16), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.22133/tlj.2023.402012.1105. [In Persian]
  3. Alves, P., Martins, H., Saraiva, P., Carneiro, J., Novais, P., & Marreiros, G. (2023). Group recommender systems for tourism: how does personality predict preferences for attractions, travel motivations, preferences and concerns?. User Model User-adapt Interact, 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09361-2
  4. Asaithambi, S. P. R., Venkatraman, R., & Venkatraman, S. (2023). A Thematic Travel Recommendation System Using an Augmented Big Data Analytical Model. Technologies, 11(1), 28. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/11/1/28
  5. Asif, M., & Fazel, H. (2024). Digital technology in tourism: a bibliometric analysis of transformative trends and emerging research patterns. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(3), 1615-1635. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-11-2023-0847
  6. Azis, N., Amin, M., Chan, S., & Aprilia, C. (2020). How smart tourism technologies affect tourist destination loyalty. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 11(4), 603-625. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2020-0005
  7. Chatterjee, J., & Dsilva, N. R. (2021). A study on the role of social media in promoting sustainable tourism in the states of Assam and Odisha. Tourism Critiques: Practice and Theory, 2(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/TRC-09-2020-0017
  8. Chengcai, T., Lingyi, S., Limei, L., & Jianghai, M. (2024). The Model and Path for Digital Cultural Tourism to Promote Rural Revitalization. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 15(3), 528-540. https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2024.03.002
  9. Chiao, H.-M., Chen, Y.-L., & Huang, W.-H. (2018). Examining the usability of an online virtual tour-guiding platform for cultural tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 23, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.05.002
  10. Choi, Y., Hickerson, B., Lee, J., Lee, H., & Choe, Y. (2022). Digital Tourism and Wellbeing: Conceptual Framework to Examine Technology Effects of Online Travel Media. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095639
  11. Constantoglou, M., & Trihas, N. (2020). The influence of social media on the travel behavior of Greek Millennials (Gen Y). Tour. Hosp. Manag, 8, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.15640/jthm.v8n2a2
  12. Cuomo, M. T., Tortora, D., Foroudi, P., Giordano, A., Festa, G., & Metallo, G. (2021). Digital transformation and tourist experience co-design: Big social data for planning cultural tourism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120345
  13. Czyz, M., & Javed, M. (2025). Revolutionizing travel: The role of smart tourism technologies in enhancing tourist satisfaction and shaping sustainable destination images: Insights from Istanbul. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 58(1), 446-455. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.58141-1426
  14. Dehligh, A. H., Zarei, G., Nouri, B. A., & Kolour, H. R. (2025). Tourists' perception of smart tourism experience in tourism destinations. Urban Areas Studies, 11(24), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.22103/jusg.2024.2126. [In Persian]
  15. Fang, L., Lu, Z., & Dong, L. (2021). Differentiating service quality impact between the online and off-line context: an empirical investigation of a corporate travel agency. International Hospitality Review, 35(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-01-2020-0003
  16. Gamidullaeva, L., Finogeev, A., Kataev, M., & Bulysheva, L. (2023). A design concept for a tourism recommender system for regional development. Algorithms, 16(2), 58.  https://doi.org/10.3390/a16020058
  17. Godovykh, M., & Tasci, A. D. (2020). Customer experience in tourism: A review of definitions, components, and measurements. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100694
  18. Groth, A., & Haslwanter, D. (2016). Efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction of responsive mobile tourism websites: a mobile usability study. Information Technology & Tourism, 16(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-015-0041-0
  19. Habibi, K., Saidi, M., & Sayari, S. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of the Development of Tourism Infrastructure on the Retention of Nourooz Tourists in Sanandaj. journal of urban tourism, 11(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2024.379414.1225 [In Persian]
  20. Helmi, M., Jauhari, A., Mahdie, M. F., Sari, N. M., Rianawati, F., & Nisa, K. (2024). The Impact of Community Engagement, Social Media, Ecotourism Policies, and Innovation on Sustainable Tourism Development in the Meratus Tahura Sultan Adam Mandiangin Geopark, South Kalimantan. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(8), e06685-e06685.
  21. Hidaka, M., Kanaya, Y., Kawanaka, S., Matsuda, Y., Nakamura, Y., Suwa, H., Fujimoto, M., Arakawa, Y., & Yasumoto, K. (2020). On-site trip planning support system based on dynamic information on tourism spots. Smart Cities, 3(2), 212-231. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3020013
  22. Huertas, A., & Iglesia, J. G. (2023). Augmented reality limitations in the tourism sector. Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social" Disertaciones", 16(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas
  23. Ionescu, A.-M., & Sârbu, F. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of smart technologies on the tourism industry. Sustainability, 16(8), 3318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083318
  24. Irsyad, Z., Iswanto, D., & Istiqlal, I. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Improving Personalization of Tourism Marketing Campaigns to Maximize Tourist Experience. SCIENTIA: Journal of Multi Disciplinary Science, 3(2), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.62394/scientia.v3i2.146
  25. Jaziri, D., & Rather, R. A. (2022). Contemporary approaches studying customer experience in tourism research. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-632-320221028
  26. Jebbouri, A., Zhang, H., Imran, Z., Iqbal, J., & Bouchiba, N. (2022). Impact of destination image formation on tourist trust: Mediating role of tourist satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 845538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845538
  27. Jeon, M. M., & Jeong, M. (2016). Influence of website quality on customer perceived service quality of a lodging website. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 17(4), 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2015.1127193
  28. Kesavan, V., & Polisetty, A. (2025). A Holistic View of Ecotourism and the Different Ways of Applying Technology to Drive Ecotourism Towards Sustainable Development. In Navigating Mass Tourism to Island Destinations: Preservation and Cultural Heritage Challenges (pp. 1-36). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9107-5.ch001
  29. Khavarian-Garmsir, A., Jashni, M., Khadem, F., Shakouri, B., & Mahallah, E. E. T. (2024). An Analysis of the role of smart tourism technologies in the memorable experience of urban tourists in Iran. journal of urban tourism, 11(4), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2024.366326.1160. [In Persian]
  30. Ku, E. C., & Chen, C.-D. (2024). Artificial intelligence innovation of tourism businesses: From satisfied tourists to continued service usage intention. International journal of information management, 76, 102757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102757
  31. Kullada, P., & Michelle Kurniadjie, C. R. (2021). Examining the influence of digital information quality on tourists’ experience. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 22(2), 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2020.1769522
  32. Liang, W., Fan, Y., Li, K.C., Zhang, D., & Gaudiot, J.L. (2020). Secure data storage and recovery in industrial blockchain network environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(10), 6543–6552.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2946548
  33. Louati, A., Louati, H., Alharbi, M., Kariri, E., Khawaji, T., Almubaddil, Y., & Aldwsary, S. (2024). Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for a Sustainable Tourism: A Case Study on Saudi Arabia. Information, 15(9), 516. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/15/9/516
  34. Louati, A., Louati, H., Kariri, E., Neifar, W., Hassan, M.K., Khairi, M.H., Farahat, M.A., & El-Hoseny, H.M. (2024). Sustainable Smart Cities through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-Based Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles. Sustainability, 16(4), 1779.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041779
  35. Lu, J. (2022). Personalized Recommendation Algorithm of Smart Tourism Based on Cross-Media Big Data and Neural Network. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2022, 9566766. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9566766
  36. Mahadin, B., Akroush, M. N., & Bata, H. (2020). The effects of tourism websites' attributes on e-satisfaction and e-loyalty: a case of American travellers' to Jordan. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 16(1), 4-33. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2020.105124
  37. Majeed, S., Zhou, Z., Lu, C., & Ramkissoon, H. (2020). Online tourism information and tourist behavior: a structural equation modeling analysis based on a self-administered survey. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00599
  38. Mariani, M., Bresciani, S., & Dagnino, G.B. (2021). The competitive productivity (CP) of tourism destinations: An integrative conceptual framework and a reflection on big data and analytics. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(9), 2970–3002. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-1436
  39. Molavi, E., & Bastenegar, M. (2024). Impact of smart tourism technologies on tourists' experiences:the case study of tourists in Museums of Tehran. journal of urban tourism, 11(4), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2024.371724.1187. [In Persian]
  40. Paraskevas, A. (2022). Cybersecurity in travel and tourism: a risk-based approach. In Handbook of e-Tourism (pp. 1605-1628). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48652-5_100
  41. Permana, K. E., Rahmat, A. B., Rochman, E. M. S., Rachmad, A., & Putro, S. S. (2025). Tourism recommendation system using user based collaborative filtering. AIP Conference Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241251
  42. Reverte, F. G., & Luque, P. D. (2021). Digital divide in e-Tourism. In Handbook of e-Tourism (pp. 1-21). Springer.
  43. Roziqin, A., Kurniawan, A. S., Hijri, Y. S., & Kismartini, K. (2023). Research trends of digital tourism: a bibliometric analysis. Tourism Critiques: Practice and Theory, 4(1/2), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/TRC-11-2022-0028
  44. Sánchez-Franco, M. J., & Rey-Tienda, S. (2024). The role of user-generated content in tourism decision-making: an exemplary study of Andalusia, Spain. Management Decision, 62(7), 2292-2328. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2023-0966
  45. Saxena, U., Singh, S. V., Shekhar, H., & Borilkar, R. (2024). Assessing User Experience and E-Service Quality of the UP Tourism Website. International Conference on Innovation and Regenerative Trends in Tourism and Hospitality Industry (IRTTHI 2024),
  46. Seyfi, S., Kim, M. J., Nazifi, A., Murdy, S., & Vo-Thanh, T. (2025). Understanding tourist barriers and personality influences in embracing generative AI for travel planning and decision-making. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 126, 104105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104105
  47. Smith, J., & Doe, J. (2024). Real-Time Data Analytics in Tourism: Integrating Predictive Modeling with Dynamic Recommender Systems. Tourism Management, 92, 104585.
  48. Talukder, M. B., & Hoque, M. (2025). Navigating the Digital Horizon: Transforming Travel Agencies in the Digital Era. In Perspectives on Digital Transformation in Contemporary Business (pp. 383-410). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5966-2.ch014
  49. Tan, W.-K., & Chen, T.-H. (2012). The usage of online tourist information sources in tourist information search: An exploratory study. The Service Industries Journal, 32(3), 451-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.529130
  50. Teymuri, I., Chianeh, R. H., & Golizadeh, Y. (2025). Identifying Factors Affecting the Development of Smart Tourism in Aras Free Zone. Journal of Tourism Space, 13(52), 81-98. [In Persian]
  51. Tian, Y., & Tang, X. (2025). The use of artificial neural network algorithms to enhance tourism economic efficiency under information and communication technology. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 8988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94268-8
  52. Wang, H., & Yan, J. (2022). Effects of social media tourism information quality on destination travel intention: Mediation effect of self-congruity and trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1049149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049149
  53. Wang, L. (2024). Enhancing tourism management through big data: Design and implementation of an integrated information system. Heliyon, 10(20), e38256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38256
  54. Wang, L. (2025). Relational exchanges in the tourism distribution channels: An exploratory study on accommodation providers and tour operators. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 25(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584231182956
  55. Wang, M. (2020). Applying Internet information technology combined with deep learning to tourism collaborative recommendation system. PloS one, 15(12), e0240656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240656
  56. Wang, X., Wang, X., & Lai, I. K. W. (2023). The effects of online tourism information quality on conative destination image: The mediating role of resonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1140519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140519
  57. Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016
  58. Yang, M. (2022). An Intelligent Recommendation Method for Tourist Attractions Based on Deep Learning. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2022, 3974109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3974109
  59. Yin, G., Huang, Z., Fu, C., Ren, S., Bao, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Examining active travel behavior through explainable machine learning: Insights from Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 127, 104038. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.104038
  60. Yu, N. (2022). Design of Machine Learning Algorithm for Tourism Demand Prediction. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 6352381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6352381
  61. Yu, S.-c. (2017). Innovation of private customized tourism development mode under the tourism E-commerce platform. 2017 2nd International Conference on Education, Management Science and Economics (ICEMSE 2017), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/icemse-17.2017.5
  62. Zelenka, J., Azubuike, T., & Pásková, M. (2021). Trust model for online reviews of tourism services and evaluation of destinations. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020034
  63. Zhang, S. (2025). Integrating User Profiles and Collaborative Filtering for Smart Recommendation of Tourism City Cultural and Creative Products. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, 2540296. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129156425402967
  64. Zhang, Y., & Deng, B. (2024). Exploring the nexus of smart technologies and sustainable ecotourism: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(11).
  65. Zhang, Y., Sotiriadis, M., & Shen, S. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Smart Tourism Technologies on Tourists’ Experiences. Sustainability, 14(5), 3048. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3048
  66. Zhu, Y., Zhang, R., Zou, Y., & Jin, D. (2023). Investigating customers’ responses to artificial intelligence chatbots in online travel agencies: the moderating role of product familiarity. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 14(2), 208-224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-02-2022-0041