Designing and validating a model for identifying obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Geography, Sadruddin Eini State University of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tajikistan

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
The aim of the current research was to identify the obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province. Therefore, this research is developmental in terms of its purpose, and in terms of the collection method, it is a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) research. In the qualitative part, the theme analysis method was used, and in the quantitative part, the structural equation modeling method was used. The statistical population included experts in the field of ecotourism in the qualitative part and nature and ecotourism tourists in the quantitative part. The studied area is the lush province of Lorestan. In the qualitative section, 15 people were selected as a sample with the purposeful snowball sampling method, and a semi-structured interview was conducted with them, and it went to the theoretical saturation stage, and in the quantitative section, 320 people were selected by random sampling. The tool for collecting findings was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative part and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part. Data analysis was done in the qualitative part with the three-step coding method of Strauss and Corbin (1989) in the Maxqda and Edrawmax software environments, in the quantitative part with structural equation modeling in the SmartPLS software. Based on the research findings in the qualitative part, there are 238 basic themes, 19 organizing themes and 6 basic themes, including environmental challenges, educational challenges, economic challenges, social and political challenges, cultural challenges and structural challenges and the use of technology for development obstacles. Ecotourism was identified in Lorestan province. The findings of the quantitative section showed that all the identified barriers were able to predict the main structure well and the model fit rate was calculated as 0.663
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Despite having many natural attractions, the country's ecotourism has faced various problems and obstacles in attracting nature tourists, which has prevented its expansion. As stated, ecotourism does not have a very suitable position in the tourism industry of our country, if infrastructure is provided and nature lovers are attracted, it is possible to get good job and income opportunities while promoting this industry. Among the 31 provinces of Iran, Lorestan province has very high capacities for the development of ecotourism due to its location in the middle Zagros mountains, its pristine and diverse nature, mountainous and dense forest areas, beautiful waterfalls, roaring rivers, wetlands and spectacular caves. Unfortunately, no special attention has been paid to it so far. Therefore, the aim of the current research is to identify the obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province. In fact, the main question of this research is, what are the obstacles and challenges for the development of ecotourism in this province?
 
Methodology
In terms of the goal, the current research was part of developmental research, and in terms of the method of gathering findings, it was part of mixed (qualitative-quantitative) research. In the qualitative part, thematic analysis method was used to identify the obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province, and in the quantitative part, structural equation modeling was used to validate the model obtained from the quantitative method.
The statistical population included experts in the field of ecotourism in the qualitative part and nature and ecotourism tourists in the quantitative part. In the qualitative section, 15 people were selected using the purposeful snowball sampling method, and in the quantitative section, 320 people were selected as samples using the random sampling method. The tools for collecting findings in the qualitative part include semi-structured interviews and in the quantitative part, researcher-made questionnaires.
The study area, the green province of Lorestan, was chosen because it has a high
 
potential to attract ecotourism opportunities in the country. Lorestan province is also a talented and ideal region for the development of ecotourism in terms of being located in the middle Zagros mountains. Due to the diversity of climatic and biological conditions (including flora and fauna), geotourism potentials, including geological resources, geomorphology, hydrogeology, karst landscapes, and water capacities, have great capabilities for the development of ecotourism.
 
Results and discussion
In the qualitative section, in the open coding stage, 238 codes were identified under the title of basic themes. In the second stage of these codes, there are 19 organizer themes including: weak environmental awareness, weak environmental knowledge, weak environmental literacy, weak tourism education system, weak tourism research system, weak practical environmental knowledge, high cost of tourism, lack of marketing. International, unfavorable financial infrastructure, politicization of the ecotourism industry, social barriers, inappropriate image of the country at the international level, weak international communication, weak environmental ethics, weak environmental beliefs, poor organization of historical centers, weakness in transportation lines, lack of Accommodation units and weakness in technological infrastructure were reduced and finally 6 main themes were identified under the titles of obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province. These obstacles include environmental challenges, educational challenges, economic challenges, social and political challenges, cultural challenges and structural challenges and exploitation of technology. In order to better understand these challenges, the results are presented in schematic number (2). In the quantitative part, the results show that the environmental barriers component is 19.77, the educational challenges component is 27.92, the social and political challenges component is 10.29, the economic challenges component is 6.75, the structural and technological challenges component is 25.15, the cultural challenges component is 17.33, predict the obstacles of ecotourism in Lorestan province.
 
Conclusion
The results of the research in the open coding stage numbered 238 basic themes, in the central coding stage number of 19 organizing themes and in the selective coding stage into 6 main themes including environmental challenges, educational challenges, economic challenges, social and political challenges, cultural challenges and The structural challenges and exploitation of technology were reduced under the title of obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province. According to the research results, one of the obstacles of ecotourism in Lorestan province was environmental challenges. In order to confirm the results of this part of the research, it can be said that the lack of environmental awareness and knowledge and the improper use of natural resources and the abuse of natural resources by natural and legal persons and even government bodies have caused significant damage to wealth, resources and assets. The natural resources of the country, which are the main and sustainable sources of ecotourism, should be imported. The results showed that another obstacle to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province is educational challenges. The discussion of education and promoting the understanding of the real value of natural resources and interaction with the local community and respect for the culture of the host community are essential educational and scientific discussions in ecotourism. Another challenge and obstacle to the development of ecotourism in Lorestan province is economic challenges. This challenge is caused by the combination of obstacles such as the politicization of the ecotourism industry, social obstacles, the inappropriate image of the country at the international level, and the weakness of international communication. In order to explain this research finding, it can be claimed that policy-making in the formulation and management of comprehensive ecotourism plans for sustainable development should be done by specialists and experts in environmental, social, tourism, and tourism sciences and under the direct supervision of governments, and so far this issue has been The general policies of Lorestan province tourism system have not been considered. Compilation of comprehensive tourism programs is basically done in three short-term, medium-term and long-term time frames and taking into account the natural and cultural capacities of each geographical region.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the  authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Alizadeh Azar, K., Ahmad Tozeh, V., & Azizian, S. (2014). An analysis of the state of tourism development and major obstacles to attract tourists in cities (case example of Mahabad). Journal of Urban Tourism, 2(3), 233-252. doi: 10.22059/JUT.2015.58446. [In Persian].
  2. Arsić, S., Nikolić, D., & Živković, Z. (2017). Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.02.003
  3. Baggozi, R. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journals of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1393), 989-1006.
  4. Beaumont, N. (2011). The third criterion of ecotourism: are ecotourists more concerned about sustainability than other tourists?. Journal of Ecotourism, 10(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2011.555554
  5. Chellik, S., Mansouri, I., Squalli, W., Achiban, H., Serbouti, S., Mounir, M., & Zidane, L. (2023). Ecotourism in Morocco: Review of the Current Situation, Natural Potential, Cultural Diversity, Obstacles and Recommendations for Future Research. Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research, 7(10), 4119-4127. http://www.doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v7i10.1
  6. Choi, M. A. (2020). Multiple environmental subjects: Governmentalities of ecotourism development in Jeungdo, South Korea. Journal of Geoforum, 110, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.011
  7. Das, M., & Chatterjee, B. (2015). Ecotourism: A panacea or a predicament? Tourism management perspectives Journal, 14, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.01.002
  8. Donohoe, H. M., & Needham, R. D. (2006). Ecotourism: The evolving contemporary definition. Journal of Ecotourism, 5(3), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.2167/joe152.0
  9. Drumm, A., & Moore, A. (2005). An introduction to ecotourism planning. The Nature Conservancy: Arlington, VA, USA.
  10. Godarzi, M., Soltani, Z., & Metininejad, A. (2023). Compilation and prioritization of factors affecting the development of medical tourism in Ahvaz metropolis. Journal of Urban Tourism. 11(1), 1-20. http://doi.org/10.22059/JUT.2024.373612.1195. [In Persian].
  11. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  12. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing .Vol(20), 277-319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  13. Heshmati,M., Nemati,A., Gheitury,M., Ahmadi,M., & Mohebi,A. (2023). Evaluation factors threatening ecotourism and its needed infrastructures for sustainable natural resources in Kermanshah province, Iran. Integrated Watershed Management, 3(1), 1-15.https://doi:org / 10.22034/IWM.2023.1998777.1069. [In Persian].
  14. Heydari Sarban, l. (2012). Analysis of obstacles affecting tourism development in Sardabe village, Ardabil city. Quarterly Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 1(1). 68-81. [In Persian].
  15. Hunt, C. A., & Harbor, L. C. (2019). Pro-environmental tourism: Lessons from adventure, wellness and eco-tourism (AWE) in Costa Rica. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 28. 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.11.007
  16. Kazemi, S., (2021), an analysis of the obstacles to the development of ecotourism in Iran, 5th International Congress of Agricultural Development, Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism of Iran, Tabriz. [In Persian].
  17. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  18. Latifi, S., &Wadi, E. (2012). Analysis of barriers to the development of rural tourism in the target villages of Hamadan city. Proceedings of the first national conference on geography and rural planning, Mashhad. Iran. [In Persian].
  19. Latifi, S., Naderi, K., & Zulikhani Sayar, L. (2013). Obstacles to the development of tourism activities In the rural areas of Hamedan (with emphasis on the target villages for tourism), Regional Planning Journal, 3(9), 77-87. [In Persian].
  20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park.
  21. Meimandi, F., Kivan Nia, S., & Shirmohammadi, A. (1402). Examining the challenges of smartening ecotourism accommodations. Journal of Urban Tourism, 10(4), 17-35. http://doi.org/10.22059/JUT.2024.352721.1102. [In Persian].
  22. Mobasheri. A.A. Shekari, F. Bagheri, M. Moaven, Z. Kiani, M. (2022). A Model of Ecotourism Development in Iran: Dimensions and Strategies. Tourism Management Studies, 17(57), 147-178. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2022.65355.2666. [In Persian].
  23. Moore, A. D., Drumm, A., Soles, A., Patterson, C., & Terborgh, J. E. (2005). Ecotourism Development: A Manual for Conservation Planners and Managers. Arlington, Virginia, USA: The Nature Conservancy. ISBN: 1-886765-14-6.
  24. Motlagh, E. Y., Hajjarian, M., Zadeh, O. H., & Alijanpour, A. (2020). The difference of expert opinion on the forest-based ecotourism development in developed countries and Iran. Land use policy, 94, 104549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104549
  25. Mousavi, S. H., Kiani, S., Sadeghi, A., & Akbari, H. (2022). Assessing the capability of ecotourism development based on ecology and management titration in Abbas Abad wildlife refuge. Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 6(16), 119-134. http://doi.org/10.22052/6.16.119. [In Persian].
  26. Movahed, A., & Zadeh Dabagh, N. (2010). Evaluation of Ecological Potential Dez River confine (Tanzimi sluice than Ghire sluice) for Ecotourism. Journal of Environmental Studies, 36(55), 13-24. [In Persian].
  27. Neger, C. (2022). Ecotourism in crisis: an analysis of the main obstacles for the sector's economic sustainability. Journal of Ecotourism, 21(4), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2021.1942019
  28. Nohegar, A. Hosseinzadeh, M.M. & Pirasteh, A. (2009). Evaluation of nature tourism capabilities of Qeshm Island using SWOT strategy management model. Geography and Development, 7(15), 151-172. [In Persian].
  29. Otcheskov, A. (2024). Development of ecotourism in the Volga region: Case studies and strategies. International Journal of Science and Research Archive,12(01), 671–682.
  30. Roday, S., Biwal, A., & Joshi, V. (2010). Tourism operations and management. Oxford: University Press.
  31. Ryngnga, P. K. (2008). Ecotourism prioritization: a geographic information system approach. South Asian journal of tourism and heritage, 1(1), 49-56.
  32. Salman, A., Jaafar, M., Mohamad, D., & Malik, S. (2021). Ecotourism development in Penang Hill: a multi-stakeholder perspective towards achieving environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 42945-42958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13609-y
  33. Samal, R., & Dash, M. (2023). Ecotourism, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods: Understanding the convergence and divergence. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.11.001
  34. Sepehr, A., & Safarabadi, A. (2012). Analysis of indicators affecting the development of ecotourism in the desert areas of Iran. Human Geography Research (Geographic Research), 45(4), 137-154.  https://doi:org/ 10.22059/JHGR.2013.36140 .[In Persian].
  35. Shemshad, M., & Malek Mohammadi, I. (2021). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Ecotourism Development (In Pasture and Forest Cooperatives in Golestan Province, Iran). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 2 (4), 19-24.
  36. Summers, J., Cavaye, J., & Woolcock, G. (2019). Enablers and Barriers of Tourism as a Driver of Economic and Social-cultural Growth in Remote Queensland. Journal of Economic Papers, 38(2), 77094.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12246
  37. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  38. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2020). World Heritage List, available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/?order=country.
  39. UNWTO. (2024). Tourism Highlights, 2014Edition, Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
  40. Veicy, H., & Mehmandoost, K. (2015). Investigation of the Obstacles of the International Tourism Development in Iran (With Emphasis on Inbound Tourism). Geopolitics Quarterly Journal, 11(37), 197-194.  http://doi.org/20.1001.1.17354331.1394.11.37.6.7 [In Persian].
  41. yazdani, A., kiani salmi, S., & boshagh, M. R. (2018). Assessment of the role of nature tourism attraction on development of the Baghbahadoran tourism and analysis of its effective indicators. Geography and Development, 16(53), 195-218. http://doi.org/10.22111/GDIJ.2018.4217. [In Persian].
urban tourism
Volume 11, Issue 2
August 2024
Pages 75-95

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics