A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Tourism Development in Historic Urban Districts: The Case of Yazd, Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Geography, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

10.22059/jut.2025.384818.1241

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
Historical tourism plays a crucial role in the economic and cultural development of cities with historical textures, such as Yazd, yet faces complex stakeholder dynamics. The involvement of multiple institutions in urban management and the diversity of actors linked to historical tourism complicates policymaking efforts. Numerous challenges and issues surrounding historical urban tourism, coupled with the wide array of involved stakeholders, make it difficult to effectively address and analyze the problems in this sector. This study employs the MACTOR method (Multi-Actor, Multi-Criteria Analysis) to analyze the roles of various stakeholders in the tourism of Yazd's historical context. The MACTOR method is an analytical tool in strategic management designed to address complex issues involving multiple topics and multiple stakeholders. The findings highlight that some key actors, including the provincial planning and management organization, the provincial political and security deputy, and the police force, exert the most influence among stakeholders. Meanwhile, three groups—local residents, shopkeepers, and tourism industry professionals—are identified as dual-role actors who are influential but also subject to external influences, limiting their independence. The municipality, the cultural heritage department, and tourists themselves act as regulatory intermediaries within the tourism system, balancing influence and being influenced. The study also reveals a high level of consensus among stakeholders on goals like increasing tourist numbers and enhancing security, while economic objectives show less alignment. These insights can assist policymakers in pinpointing stakeholders with shared goals and crafting effective strategies for sustainable tourism growth.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urban tourism has increasingly become a dynamic and complex phenomenon within urban environments. While it holds significant potential for fostering economic growth and cultural exchange, the varying and often conflicting priorities of different stakeholders pose challenges to effective management. This complexity is particularly pronounced in historic districts, such as Fahadan in Yazd, where tensions arise among various institutions, including the municipality, Cultural Heritage Organization, law enforcement, and local residents. These tensions complicate tourism policy development. The pursuit of tourism in Fahadan faces obstacles related to cultural preservation and security concerns, compounded by the lack of consensus on goals among stakeholders. This study utilizes a "multi-issue, multi-actor" framework to analyze these stakeholders and assess their roles and influences on sustainable tourism development, with the objective of identifying key stakeholders and their contributions toward achieving the primary tourism goals in Fahadan.
 
Methodology
The research adopts the Multi-Actor, Multi-Issue (MAMS) framework to conduct a stakeholder analysis. This approach is grounded in the recognition that real-world challenges rarely occur in isolation and typically involve a network of actors from government, business, and local communities. The MACTOR method, introduced by Michel Godet in 1985, is employed to explore the interactions between stakeholders and their respective positions concerning key objectives. This method follows a structured six-step process, ranging from stakeholder and issue identification to power dynamics analysis and scenario forecasting. The study's sample population comprises tourism managers, scholars, business owners, local residents, foreign nationals, and tourists, all selected using diverse sampling techniques.
 
 
 
Discussion and Findings
The analysis identifies at least ten key stakeholders directly impacting the management of tourism in Yazd’s historic district. Despite differences in their roles and responsibilities, these stakeholders can influence eight primary tourism development goals. The findings reveal that three key stakeholders—namely, the Provincial Planning and Management Organization, the Political, Security, and Social Affairs Deputy of the Governor's Office, and the Police—are categorized as external or influential actors. These stakeholders exert significant influence over others but are relatively unaffected by other stakeholders. Given their authoritative and often unilateral approach, consensus-building with these actors is challenging. Consequently, prioritizing their satisfaction is essential in any tourism development initiative for the historic district.
According to the Net Influence (NS) index, the Political, Security, and Social Affairs Deputy of the Governor's Office emerges as the most influential stakeholder, exerting both direct and indirect impacts on others, with a net influence score of 41. While the Police and Provincial Planning and Management Organization also hold substantial influence, they are not as dominant as the Deputy. Conversely, foreign nationals and immigrants exhibit the least influence, with a score of -58. The Cultural Heritage Organization’s limited influence is attributed to its narrow scope of responsibilities and reliance on approvals from other entities, thereby diminishing its decision-making autonomy and reducing its role in tourism-related decisions.The stakeholder agreement analysis indicates a general convergence on key objectives, with no significant opposition among stakeholders. Goals such as increasing tourist attraction, improving district security, and enhancing resident satisfaction garner the highest levels of agreement. In contrast, economic goals like promoting entrepreneurship and job creation are less prioritized, suggesting a broader perspective on tourism that emphasizes its non-economic dimensions.
The stakeholder-objective relationship map highlights that the Municipality, local residents, and the Social Affairs Deputy are central actors with the most responsibility for achieving the outlined objectives. In contrast, tourists, the Police, and foreign nationals have weaker connections to these objectives and play a more marginal role in realizing them. This analysis suggests that efforts should focus on these central actors to achieve key goals in the tourism development of Yazd’s historic district.
 
Conclusion
The MACTOR analysis illustrates the diverse roles that governmental, private, and local actors play in shaping tourism policies and strategies. Government stakeholders, such as the Provincial Planning and Management Organization, the Political, Security, and Social Affairs Deputy, and the Police, wield the most influence over other actors, making their satisfaction a priority in tourism development plans. On the other hand, dual-role stakeholders, including local residents, business owners, and tourism sector activists, serve as key consensus-builders, facilitating coordination among stakeholders. Independent actors, such as foreign nationals and immigrants, have a minimal impact on tourism objectives. The convergence and divergence analysis shows that while there is overall agreement among stakeholders, the level of alignment varies across objectives. Goals such as increasing tourist attraction, enhancing district security, and improving resident satisfaction see the highest levels of agreement, whereas economic objectives, like boosting entrepreneurship and employment, receive less consensus. The stakeholder-objective map further indicates that the Municipality, local residents, and the Social Affairs Deputy bear the most responsibility for achieving these goals, while tourists, the Police, and foreign nationals have the least connection to the objectives.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Alizadeh, S. D. (2010). An investigation of the social harms of tourism in the Samen district of Mashhad metropolis (With emphasis on tourism security) [Master's thesis, Payame Noor University, Tehran]. Supervisor: Mohammad Taghi Rahnamayi. [in Persian].
  2. Amanpour, S., Maleki, S., Ahadnezhad, M., & Moradi Mofrad, S. (2017). Evaluation of environmental quality of urban tourism destinations in line with sustainable development (Case study: Shushtar County). Geography (Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Geographical Association), 15(54), 79–96. [in Persian].
  3. Ardian, A., Asadi, M. M., & Ahmadkhani, M. (2021). Explaining network interactions between entrepreneurs and tourism business owners using social network analysis (Case study: Yazd city). Tourism and Development, 10(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2020.222754.1982[in Persian].
  4. Azami, M., Jalilian, S., & Hashemi Amin, N. (2015). Analysis of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of sustainable tourism (Case study: Nureh village). Tourism Planning and Development, 4(14), 154–174. [in Persian].
  5. Booyens, I., & Visser, G. (2015). Cultural heritage tourism and stakeholder management: Insights from South Africa. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 13(2), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2014.971104
  6. Butler, R. W. (1991). The concept of carrying capacity: Area, attraction, and destination. Journal of Environmental Management, 32(1), 3-23. DOI:10.1002/PTH.6070020309
  7. Carlos, Martínez-Ávila., Stefan, Olander. (2024). 1. Stakeholder participation in the implementation of urban property development projects. Construction Management and Economics, doi: 10.1080/01446193.2024.2361789
  8. Chan, J. K. L. (2023). Sustainable rural tourism practices from the local tourism stakeholders' perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(7), 1500-1516. https:// doi:10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.136
  9. Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X
  10. dialectic of the universal and particular. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(2), 117-135, DOI: 10.1080/13527250220143913
  11. Dormán, A. (2023). The spatial injustice in tourism-led historic urban area renewal: An analytical framework from stakeholder analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2203849
  12. Dupeyras, A., & MacCallum, N. (2013). Indicators for measuring competitiveness in tourism: A guidance document. OECD Tourism Papers, 2013/02, 1–62.
  13. Dwyer, L., & Edwards, D. (2009). Tourism product and service innovation to avoid ‘strategic drift’. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(4), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.690
  14. Elyssa, A-F., Aïda, Ben, M-J., Feyrouz, H-Ben, T. (2024). 2. Stakeholder Dynamics in the Context of a Local Urban Project. Social business, doi: 10.1362/204440824x17074776135987
  15. Gabriela, M. (2024). 4. Urban stakeholders as key to manage models for urban regeneration: contribution from scientific literature (2009-2022). Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, doi: 10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).aae-05
  16. Getz, D. (2008). Event tourism: Definition, evolution, and research. Tourism Management, 29, 403-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.017
  17. Godet, M. (1985). Introduction to the MACTOR method. Futures, 17(3), 200-214.
  18. Godet, M. (2006). Creating futures: Scenario planning as a strategic management tool. Preface by Joseph F. Coates.
  19. Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic foresight for corporate and regional development. Elsevier Science.
  20. Graeme Evans (2002) Living in a World Heritage City: stakeholders in the
  21. Hall, C. M. (2008). Tourism planning: Policies, processes, and relationships. Pearson Education.
  22. Hall, C. M., & Page, S. J. (2014). The geography of tourism and recreation: Environment, place and space (4th ed.). Routledge.
  23. Hataminejad, H., & Sharifi, A. (2015). Investigating the role of urban tourism development in sustainable urban development (Case study: Sanandaj city). Urban Tourism Journal, 2(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2015.54066[in Persian].
  24. Heger, T., & Rohrbeck, R. (2012). Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(5), 819-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.003
  25. Hermans, L. M., & Thissen, W. A. H. (2009). Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 808-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.040
  26. Karimi, F., Jalili Sadraabad, S., & Kheiraldin, R. (2021). Identification and structural analysis of change drivers in land use (Case study: Fahadan neighborhood, historical texture of Yazd). Iranian Future Studies, 6(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2022.1298[in Persian].
  27. Kouri, M., Beig Babaei, B., & Norouzi Sani, P. (2021). Explaining the factors affecting stakeholders' perspectives on the sustainability of urban tourism development (Case study: Tabriz metropolis). Tourism Planning and Development, 10(37), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.22080/jtpd.2020.18096.3216[in Persian].
  28. Liao, T., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The Analysis of Centrality for Stakeholders of Historical and Cultural Blocks -Taking Chengdu as an Example. 2020 5th International Conference on Economics Development, Business & Management (EDBM 2020) DOI: 10.25236/edbm.2020.062
  29. Malekzadeh, N., Bazzazzadeh, M., & Rafieian, M. (2016). Identifying and analyzing key factors affecting urban development with a foresight approach (Case study: Karaj metropolis). Geography and Urban Space Development, 3(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v3i2.49479[in Persian].
  30. Mehrabi, M., Ansari, M., & Rafieian, M. (2023). Future studies of the historical texture of Yazd city based on World Heritage sustainability drivers. Urban Studies Quarterly, 12(46), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2022.012[in Persian].
  31. Mirajanatin, H. P., Sutikno, F. R., & Sari, N. (2013). Kajian potensi pariwisata perkotaan di Kota Malang berdasarkan stakeholder.
  32. Morvati Sharifabadi, A., Azizi, F., & Jamshidi, Z. (2016). Analysis of the factors affecting domestic tourist satisfaction in Yazd province using the fuzzy DEMATEL model. Tourism Management Studies, 11(33), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2016.4165[in Persian].
  33. Moscardo, G. (2011). Exploring social representations of tourism planning: Issues for governance. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4-5), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.558625
  34. Movahed, A. (2007). Urban Tourism. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. [in Persian].
  35. Nakhai, M., & Khodadad, M. (2015). Urban tourism feasibility study using the SOAR strategic model (Case study: Bonab city). The 2nd International Conference on Management, Accounting, and Economics, March 2016. [in Persian].